2014年1月16日 星期四

Research Paper: The Responsibility of Privacy on Facebook












The Responsibility of Privacy on Facebook
Alice Chen
National Central University





Abstract
Facebook has swept the globe in recent years and has already had more than one billion users in the world. But this kind of social network service also reveals severe problems of privacy. In this paper, the article starts from an opposition to the controversial statement from Facebook’s founder, Zuckerberg, who said that “privacy is no longer a social norm” on an interview. Then the article will discuss privacy issue from individuality, arguing the mass neglect of leaking privacy according to Acquiti’s study in 2013, following by the analysis of the entire commercial environment. Based on these ideas, the article will conclude a possible future for Facebook and suggestions of optional settings at last.        
        Keyword: Facebook, privacy



The Responsibility of Privacy on Facebook
The privacy has been discussed since the first day Facebook launched to the Internet, and it has been closely evaluated by users especially after Zuckerberg’s interview, saying that “privacy is no longer a social norm” (Johnson 2010.) As more and more people use Facebook, privacy problem no longer exists in person but a worldwide occurrence with severe potential problems.
The Opposition toward “Privacy is No Longer a Social Norm”
Facebook has revealed more and more functions for its customers, but what really lies behind these conveniences are fatal to users’ privacy. To ease the anxiety of the users, Zuckerberg, the Facebook founder, tried to convince the public that people nowadays tend to share themselves on the Internet, and privacy had to be evolved. But according to Johnson’s (2010) argument: when Facebook decided to redefine the meaning of privacy, it changed the original goal of establishing a social network between the Ivy league, and also the function of building an open and transparent world.
Also, Johnson (2010) mentioned the launching of the “contentious advertising system”, which allowed advertisers to track Facebook users to search and collect potential buyers. Although this system made Facebook lose a large amount of money in its lawsuit, the business behind the system might bring more than people can imagine.
   Emphasizing that Facebook had revealed more and more functions for the public, it was not surprise to see some naive users happened to do embarrassing things, only because they thought they launched information in private, which is actually reaching to the public.
Privacy Norm Doesn’t Change The Misunderstanding of Young People
 We also need to rethink the attitude of privacy in young people, which could be misunderstood. The sharing of young people doesn’t mean that they do care about strangers invading their private. Instead, they tend to share themselves on the Internet because they think they could have their own space without disturbance, especially when teenagers do not feel the secure of privacy in their rooms due to their parents. And Facebook offered this illusion. When they think that they create a private social circle and put everything on Facebook, they are actually exposing themselves to the craving advertising company.
Facebook are Failing User’s Trust
The success of Facebook is established on users trust and reliance. When it starts to transform or even sell out user’s information to advertisement, only explaining that they are following world’s trend and breaking social norms, it cheats on the users and also betrays the original trust at first. Some online users even say that all we need is a new social network to embrace rather than exposing ourselves nakedly to others.
Why Privacy on Facebook matters?
My former section takes an opposite side from the Facebook founder’s talk. And I give several examples from my resources such as the craving advertising system to support my argument. In this section, I will proof how Facebook may interfere our life and privacy to correspond to it.
They hold more information than you think
Some people may think that one shouldn’t put information on Facebook if they do care about the possibilities of lacking privacy. However, according to the privacy expert, professor Acquisti (2003), you are actually exposed to the danger ever since you had a Facebook account. Strangers can reach your Facebook account by one single photo, and then collect personal information to figure out your life. They can even get your ID numbers through specific government websites!  

In this experiment, professor Acquisti performs several interesting examples to show the privacy problem on Facebook. The first one indicates how Facebook might leak our personal information even from the most negligible part. This experiment emphasizes the potential crisis on Facebookan indirect way to invade our privacy. The second experiment links your Facebook’s friends with the advertising companies. Here, Acquisti suggests a new promoting way. The advertisements can mix two faces of your most intimate friends into one, creating and replacing the salesman face that you won’t recognize but familiar with. By doing so, you may have greater chances to pay for their products. Although it seems a little funny and ridiculous, one should admit that this kind of advertisement will catch you at the first sight, not to mention the higher possibility to pay for their products.

 

Commerce and Facebook

To analyze why such a great company can’t figure out efficient ways to protect privacy, let’s look back to the source of this profitable business river. It’s obvious that Facebook is not a charity, and they need to gain money from its users. So how do Facebook profit? According to the article (Johnson 2009), Facebook not only provides precise advertisements to users, but also creates virtual gifts or properties to catch people’s attention. As a result, Facebook mainly collect information according to the reaction of its users and sell it to advertising companies. That is to say, they earn money by trading user’s privacy. But what if the users are unhappy about it and they don’t want to be the bargaining chips of Facebook? Do they have power to control it? The answer is no because of Facebook’s inefficient settings.
Inefficient settings
Research finds out that up to 36% of information share with default privacy settings, and only 37% matches to users expectation (Liu, Krishnamurthy, Gummadi & Mislove, 2010.) It shows that although some are aware of their privacy, they are not allowed to have enough ways to manage and even protect. Also, as we put information on the Internet to share with friends, do we really want these trivial dates be collected? In the research paper of professor Qi, “we might offer personal information voluntarily to several separated data base. For example, we leave scores in schools and medical records in hospital. But it doesn’t mean we allow others to collect them and further reveal our undiscovered side.” So is it right for Facebook to memorize our behaviors and collect every click we made without noticing us? The answer might be wrong.
The possible future and suggestions for privacy on Facebook
With the rapid growth of technology, we can say it decisively that more and more social online websites like Facebook may pop out in the near future. But what kind of online privacy will we have in the future? And how can Facebook improve?
Complicated due to new technologies and advertising companies
The possible future for privacy on Facebook can be concluded to one word: complicatednot only is it difficult in reaching balance, but also problematic in dealing with the varieties of technologies. Just like what professor Qi mentions: “Privacy is not a new issue. However, due to the growth of information technology, it appears with different kinds of formation in all levels, which is more severe and urgent to focus on.”
 As more and more people recognize the privacy problem, Facebook has already noticed and tried to find ways to content their customers. However, not only Facebook, but also Google and other social networks have faced the dilemma between advertisers and customer’s privacy. According to the statistics, Facebook makes more than 84% in revenue by online advertising (Kelly, 2013.) They are mostly lived by selling information to advertisers. But it doesn’t mean that the users can’t fight back. Facebook definitely don’t want to lose their users, and they also understand that users can stop using it and embrace new websites just in a few clicks. Besides, with the rapid growth of technology, privacy problems will only become more complex. From the small sensors that can track your location to smart cars which are not yet common place, the more we attach to the Internet, the more we expose ourselves to the public. “Privacy is increasingly becoming a feature,” said Brendon Lynch, Microsoft's chief privacy officer (Kelly, 2013.) In short, the balance between privacy and profits will only become more and more difficult to reach.
Solution: optional settings
However, Kelly (2013) suggests a core idea that “not everyone will want the same levels of privacy”, and Facebook should make user’s privacy optional with higher transparency. According to the author’s example, “personal data such as location have many potentially positive uses, such as food recommendations, social apps and dating services.” (Kelly 2013) Balancing privacy and customized service may become possible when the settings are optional and easy-to-check. Another way Facebook can use is the “Do Not Disturb” system, which has been adopted by major browsers such as Google and Firefox. This system allows users to choose whether they accept the websites to provide online tracking. Some describe this system as a nuclear bomb in advertising (Kelly, 2013.) while others consider it as a good way to protect their privacy. Moreover, privacy settings on Facebook should be more active to the customers. For example, when a new account is introduced into Facebook, the website should actively illustrate how Facebook works on their personal data. And Facebook can integrate private information only if the user agrees to receive personal services.
Conclusions
       We might change our thoughts and tend to put more information on the Internet someday in exchange for customized servings. However, as long as people feel uncomfortable about sharing themselves, Facebook should respect and offer more options for them. Facebook unpacks a gift for people: a new platform for social. But in another aspect it could be poison with a sugar coat, making most of the people vulnerable when they choose to embrace the world naively. Based on the mutual trust and business ethics, it is obvious that Facebook should take care of our privacy more carefully.



References

Acquisti, A. (2013, August). Alessandro Acquisti: Why Privacy Matters [Video file] [Video file]. Retrieved Oct 29, 2013, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_pqhMO3ZSY

Bilton, N. (2010, May 12). Price of Facebook Privacy? Start Clicking. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/technology/personaltech/13bas ics.html?_r=0

Johnson, B. (2009). How exactly is Facebook making money?. Retrieved November 29,2013, fromhttp://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2009/sep/16/facebook-money

Johnson, B. (2010). Privacy no longer a social norm, says Facebook founder. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy

Kelly, H. (2013, March 1). Figuring out the future of online privacy. CNN, Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/tech/web/online-privacy-policies/.

Liu, Y., Gummadi, K. P., Krishnamurthy, B., & Mislove, A. (2009). Analyzing Facebook Privacy Setting: User Expectation V.S. Reality. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2068823

Qi, G. (2011). The ethic issue in information age. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~phi/NRAE/newsletter/no5/04.html


 

Final Transcription

Final Transcription 2014/1/9   Alice=A Kevin=K
A: Hello everyone. Thank you for your patience and we are the last group. And our topic today is “Should Facebook take full responsibility for the privacy?” And I am Alice.
K: I am Kevin
K: Well, for our presentation, let’s start a game with a sort drama.
A: And our drama topic is “do you want to be tagged in Facebook?
A: Okay, I want to tell you a secret, that… I am going to see some, someone tomorrow. And he is this handsome guy. And we have been chatted for about two months. So I am going to see him. So do you think I should check his Facebook profile and these photos? Do you think? (Yes) I also think so.
A: oh! I don’t know what this is going to tell. Is it… the french fries is tasty, or the French fries is sexy? I don’t know… (laughter) okay. 
A: Oh! Maybe I just… need to think twice, or…something. Uhm… I am so disappointed. And…
K: and then is tomorrow. I am here to meet my internet friend. Oh! It’s Alice. Um…Alice, for a long time I want to tell you a secret. Actually, I have a crush on you for a long time. Can you become my girlfriend?
A: Sorry Kevin. You know I see your photos on Facebook, and I think we… um we just need to be friends.
K: OH, oh my god! Well, I think I have to rescan the relationship between our privacy and Facebook. And that’s what we are going to talk about today.
A: Yes!
K: Ok, for our context, we will devided into a four aspect. The first part is the term. We are going to redefine the term, how do we really think about privacy. And here’s the two side. One is the positive approve side about… we will talk…we will use an interview with Zuckerburg. And actually there should be a z-u-c. ya! Um…and then we will also include so negative opposition toward the founder of Facebook, Zuckerburg.
A: the second part we are going to talk about is, how privacy influence and interact with individuality. So we are going to argue at two different sides. Kevin will talk about the individuality is based on self- satisfaction. And for me, I think, privacy is… the leaking privacy can actually harm us.
K: And for our four aspect, we are going to talk about how commerce work with the privacy on Facebook. For me, I am going to talk about the commercial value of privacy collection, and Alice will fight against it. It will… she will talk about how Facebook might misuses our privacy during collection.
A: And the last part we are going to discuss the future of privacy… of privacy on Facebook. For me, I think Facebook should offer more optional settings. And for Kevin, he thinks Facebook will become more and more open. 
K: Ok, here is our first aspect. Definition, the term privacy. How we really regard the term, privacy. Um…let’s take a look at the interview in 2010. The Zuckerburg, the Zuckerburg, the founder of Facebook once said: “privacy is no longer a social norm.” so I would like to ask all of you, do you really approve his idea. If you approve, please raise your hand.
A: do you think use…
K: what do you say… what do you say the sentence is right for us?
Emma: um I think you should… you should talk the social… what is the definition about the social norm.
K: um… because um, during the interview. Sorry for we can’t find the video clip. We don’t know why, it doesn’t exit on YouTube. In fact, the Zuckerburg during the interview because the internet(?) ask him that for many they argue, say that the Facebook harm the users’ privacy. So here is his comment. He thinks was no longer a social norm and what he do is just a… walk with a tide. Um,,, what are norm may evolve into.. ok? Um… perhaps we should move on. Um… I think is the chair broken. Ok, now come back. So I think maybe we should just start with our presentation first and after our presentation we can ask for your opinions. OK, get back to it. And what Zuckerburg has said soon arouse a lot of discussion on he social media and also on the Internet. For some of the people, just like me, we stand for positive approval. We do think privacy norms do change. For today’s norm do not fit tomorrow’s definition. For example, at about 70 years ago we can’t accept bikini as a way to show women’s figure. And here’s another real place in blog market in Taiwan. In about 6 or 7 years ago, wretch cc blog, 無名小站, used to be a very popular site for youngster. In 2007, user’s account on the wretch blog has reach its summit to 20 million. And here it is. 20 million. However the stiff monotonous platform and the function can not really satisfy our users. And here is the snapshot of the 無名interface. As you can see, the setup is very stiff and for the information share is not very directly. And it’s full of propaganda there. After Facebook, we feature both an innovative and information share as well as the online direction, people use Facebook instead. And there is a data shows that according to the static shows that in 2013, just one year ago, and Facebook has more than one billion users, and the record is still rising. It’s more than 10 times of the Yahoo blog. And unfortunately, in fact, wretch blog has just ended its business in just two weeks ago, because it can’t meet the privacy norms change, and what customers really want.
A: ok, and for me, as Kevin what Zuckerburg just said, I hold an opposition opinion for two points. And the privacy norm is like how people consider privacy nowadays. So my first point is “privacy norm doesn’t change” Sorry Kevin.
K: Oh that’s fine
A: and I want to especially points out young people because young people is the main customers for Facebook. The misunderstanding of young person because the sharing of them doesn’t mean they do not care about privacy. And in fact, they actually think they try to share themselves on the Internet because they think they could have their own space without disturbance. Especially the teenagers, they don’t have the secure of privacy due to their parents. And Facebook offer this kind of illusions. So we really misunderstanding these young people. So it’s like this picture. The young people they really need help and they are desperately need for privacy. And we just give them the soap, right? Um do you need soap? No I want help.
And my second point is when Facebook decides to expose more privacy to the public, and they still try to find excuse. It’s like they are betraying their user’s trust. And the evidence is the recent launch of the controversial advertising system. This system is about the advertisers to track Facebook users in order to search and collect the potential buyers.
A: ok, our, our next topic talks about the relationship between the individuality and privacy.
A: So privacy is like two side of one coin. And it has a positive side of satisfaction and negative side with leaking. Here I want to introduce you how privacy may interfere our individuality. And actually on Facebook, privacy is more severe than you think. And to point out this subtitle, I especially want to tell people that think if you think, if you think one shouldn’t put information on Facebook if they do care about privacy, right? Some people may think this. So here I want to show you an experiment. And you can explain that you can actually expose you privacy ever since you have a Facebook account. (video)
A: yes, and here, this is an experiment from professor. And it shows that strangers can actually use some technology to… to collect your personal photos and even get to your personal ID.
A: So…so this is how leaking privacy may harm us. And as a result, I think Facebook may… sometimes Facebook may make us become more open-minded and share… share with our life. But I want to say that open and transparent doesn’t mean you have to be naked to the public. And I believe each person will want some… will want privacy in some degrees. So to end my point, I want to say that less privacy is equals to less freedom.
K: However…oops sorry. However sharing privacy is based on our satisfaction. For example the psychology satisfaction. We somehow get desire to pry and be pride in privacy. Why? And here is the Freud explanation. Freud said: “it is our nature to pry others’ privacy. It arouses from childhood and we all want to the watch how others make their living.  In order to answer the physic question, where are we come from? And there is another real case in US newspaper industry back to 19 century. In early 19century, the US newspaper serves just like a (?) is quite boring, and it has nothing to do with the entertainment. However, after a series of newspaper, such as the “solar”, the “penis” join the market. Newspaper become a part of the ordinary people they like. Why? This style of newspaper fill more about scandals such as the marital affair and a lot of privacy of celebrities. We love to pry on other’s private information. And there is a record can explain this phenomena. The ten times rise from 1808 to 1852 really show how we love to peak on other’s privacy. And here is the copy of the “solar” in Europe. It is a copy of maybe near 19 century.
K: Also, the share in private information also bring good outcome in social interaction. For most people, close connection with friends can be represented by sharing more. Maybe you like to tell your friends what to eat today, where you go today, what happen today. And it also represent trust to their friends. Also, we enjoy fans as we were the big superstar and tell other’s about our stories, pictures and any other private information. By sharing our private information, we gain our fame and peer trust. And that’s the important part in our puberty. As a consequence, we can see most of the Facebook’s job has, what they has done mostly is just for our desire. The third one we would like to discuss the relationship between commercials and Facebook. How do privacy function in the business. At first we have to know the fact that Facebook mainly profit from its users’ privacy data, and for this part, we will discuss it later in detail. And for the fact, it brings out the two effects. The first one is that the commercial value of Facebook privacy collection. And it’s actually very profitable for Facebook. And however it also have the disadvantage effect for Facebook might misuses privacy during collection.
K: To understand how Facebook function, we have to know how it works, what the strcure is? And we all know Facebook is a very popular website for more than three or four years. But how do they gain popularity? They gain popularity on the base on our trust. How do they do to our trust form customers? First, no propaganda. We all know when you use Facebook there won’t be propagandas jump out. And for most of the service on Facebook are charged free. You don’t have to pay any for your Facebook usage. But after all, Facebook is not a charity. They still have to make money. How do they make money? The answer is from our privacy data. In fact, privacy is the gold mine for cyber generations.
K: our privacy information ganging from preference, social network, personality and taste are useful and precious for advertising company. Facebook sells these data to ad company. And then after the advertising company analyze these data, they sell the record back to the company who wants these record. For many big cooperation for example, apple or Samsung or google. Um… I should said Samsung. Samsung is the Taiwanese use. Ok, that’s not the point! The statistic data is used for the big cooperation to develop their market strategy. They can quickly understand what their target customer’s really need, and also how to promote their product to their customers. Before Facebook, we can only acquire these data to the questionnaire. However the questionnaire reability and efficiency somehow compromise the efficiency. The of Facebook face the proper right. It comes to the customers with relatively indirect and tender approach, which makes it a very successful method. Facebook has save the way out of money and time to…to introduce the accurate product to the market.
A: so Kevin actually talk about the large profit of privacy. I think depends on the fact Facebook profits from our privacy. Facebook use the wrong method and it re…reverse to harm the users. From, at first, it comes from the coarse Facebook display for users, next it misapprehend in privacy settings, which this part we will talk about it later. And later, this part will cause user’s anxiety.
A: so the second part is why Facebook did wrong. And I want to talk about how poor and inconvenient these settings is. According to a research, up to 6… up to 36% of information share with default privacy settings, and after they adjust their privacy settings, they are still 37% doesn’t match the user’s expectation. So this indicates that even some people aware about their privacy settings, they don’t have… um they don’t have enough entrance to manage and even protect their privacy.
A: and another basic problem is that “is it correct to collect our privacy?” I mean it is that you left schools… scores in your school, and like you may left medical record in hospital. But it didn’t mean you allow others to collect them and reveal your un…and you don’t want people to reveal this part of you. I mean can you imagine that one day the advertiser understand you more that your best friend or something? It may happen some days. So I think, before Facebook collecting these, they may, they should have asked our permission first. And let us know how they want to do with our privacy.
K: so after the long presentation, so Alice, what do you think about the future that might would be for the Facebook.
A: OK, good question, Kevin. I think the possible future for Facebook is it will become more complicated and more difficult reach the balance. And here I want to give some suggestions to Facebook. It is about the optional settings, such as the “do not disturb system”.
A : so why should Facebook offer optional settings. Here’s the reason, because not everyone wants the same level of privacy. So an easy settings, easy to control may help Facebook to control privacy problems. And I want to emphasize that as long as there are still people, they don’t feel comfortable about sharing themselves, Facebook should respect and make optional settings for them.
K: However, on the other hand, Facebook in the future will be more open. In the future, privacy will still play the crux in the whole industry.
K: For privacy itself, it is hybrid. It provide both incentive, support simultaneously. For incentive side, what Facebook will do is to attract customers. It is their utmost goal. Sharing more means more profit to get. On this spot, the barrier such as the misconception aroused from the limitation of typed words and stiff interface are the annoying cost which needs to be eliminated. Moreover although the Facebook is charge- free. As a consequence, there will be more new function and service to overcome these plights. Besides, We somehow still have to pay for accessibility. I believe most of you use your I Phone or Samsung… Uh… I should say Samsung, wrong pronunciation, ha ha. Ok. The price of cell phone is annoying. And we also have to pay for internet and any other accessibility cost. These high cost somehow discourage us from using more. As a result, in the future, the expenditure for accessibility will drop.
K: Then, there is another new question. For new services and technologies as well as cost down, they all need money. But how’s the money come? And that’s the support part. The money earned from less barriers now will benefit the further development. It is a profitable investment for Facebook. Firstly, there will soon be more new technology and service on the Facebook. For maybe one day, to put it more aggressively, your Facebook may be touchable and smellable. Also, moreover, in the future 3C products will no longer the protagonists but the useful tool to access our account. Their price and other accessibility price will drop. That’s another practical benefit we can got from Facebook.
K: For the consequence, our conclusion. We all agree the privacy will be the most important part for Facebook. Facebook will definitely exploit to its utmost. Privacy is the goldmine for cyber generation.
On the other hand, Facebook will and should develop more optional and exclusive setting. After all privacy can bring satisfaction. It can also bring destruction to individuality as well as firms. Facebook should really take good care of it.

Q&A
Question 1: Is that your, you’re the point of…. Uh? Your summary… uh… ah… Oh, I want to ask you because I think your theory is more like a they’re thinking about upper class? What is that. Because of…
Kevin: You mean the upper class and…
Question 1: Yeah, yeah. The triangle? The picture. Because you agree with the open privacy. And you’re more seems to be close to the complete more into the privacy? It seems to have you… you actually have the stronger power than the person to protect their privacy.
Kevin: Uh… actually, I think umm… I think that it is not what I really mean. Because what I point out for the future, I just point out what the Facebook company, what they respond to, what they will do in the future. Um… but I also mention that they still have to respect customers. Because for privacy, the privacy is a controversial thing, because it is actually profitable as you can see on these data and pictures. They’re actually… They have already utilized these things as their goldmine. But privacy can also very harmful for as Alice had pointed out. So our idea is that uh… Facebook, for sure, they will, there will be more information share since it is profitable. Actually there is another psychological purpose for proof and also other social interaction proof proves that in our subtext we somehow desire to share our information. But, Facebook really, still has to respect customers because not every customers has the same norm about privacy. Yeah, if they have all the customers in very open- ended privacy setting. It may offense some customers. And it can be very dangerous. Is that answer your question?

Question 2: Um… Would you want to say to people, we are here. If we don’t hand out our information of privacy.
Alice: Do you mean should I tell them don’t use Facebook with care about this?
Question 2: No,no… cause you think Facebook should have more uh… more privacy, more option for security. Because someone doesn’t want their privacy on the internet. They don’t like it. It is not anything for fun. So, what do you say for it?
Alice: Um… so I present that video. It is talk about, sometimes you think I put this. I put one photo on the internet it doesn’t matter. But, it actually can know many things, like your personal ID. There are some specific, methods or technology. So sometimes when you tagging photos or something. It is more severe than its meaning. Yes.
Question 3: You say of the free of charge. Uh… the price of using Facebook is that your privacy?
Kevin: Uh… Yes, Unfortunately yes. And also some relevant cost such as you have to pay for your 3G internet. When you use your cellphone to surf your Facebook, you also have to pay for your cellphone itself and also the internet fee. Yeah. For Facebook company itself, the profit is on the users… bla… private data, private data.
Question 3: Do you think it is a fair exchange, free service for your privacy?
Kevin: Well, umm… it depends. But for the value of economical principle. Probably, Yes. You somehow have to pay for what you got.
Question4: Can I ask that companies pay money to buy users’ privacy. And I don’t how they’re going to use them. To make profit?
Kevin: Umm… For example, I will take a very simple example from Facebook. For example, you will see some question on the Facebook. For example they will ask, would you like this movie? Yeah and you may respond in your point one, two, three, four, five, right? One is dislike and five is you very like it. Then, they can know how much do you respond to their products. It is a very simple example. And there are other examples, for example, maybe the interface of the Facebook has some psychology meaning. It leads customers to answer some questions. It just like an implicit questionnaire. It can know how you act to the specific stuff. And they will use these data to their market strategy.
Question 4: So it just like a questionnaire? They earn money from knowing what we like and we dislike?
Alice & Kevin: Yeah, just like that.

Alice: it also. There are some potential problem like, some experts predict that in the future maybe advertisers sell information to the producers. And producers can predict what you want to buy. And then, in some says, you can say that, even you don’t want to buy… Uh… It can influence the behavior of buyers

2014年1月10日 星期五

Reflection 2

In our final presentation, we will divide our topic into four aspects. First, we announce our arguments relatively according to Zuckerberg’s words, and list why we suppose or oppose his statement in lines. For the second and third part, we will illustrate our idea about privacy from individuality to the aspect of commerce. I think we need to handle this two topics carefully because our arguments don’t fight directly. They are more like the two sides of the same issue. Besides, these two sections are more professional and serious. So how can we keep the attention of our audience is another big challenge. At last, we will talk about future and suggestions, which is based on our annotation 4. We will briefly introduce how Facebook might work in the future. For our conclusion, we will show two arrows in opposite direction on our PPT. One is “open” and one is “optional settings”.
To catch our audience at the first sight, we decide to introduce our motivation in an interesting way. After discussion, we choose to perform a show about tagging people in Facebook, because people like to be tagged in their beautiful photos instead of strange and ugly one. Also, some are worried about that the person they secretly in love with will see their undiscovered side. Combining with these two reasons, the show will begin in the situation when Alice is going to meet her friend online (Kevin), and is surprised to see several Kevin’s ugly photos. Hope it will work that day.    

2013年12月25日 星期三

Transcription 2 (2013/12/19)

Hello everyone, I am Alice (and I am Kevin). And our topic today is should Facebook take responsibility of privacy? And my topic is “the possible future and suggestions for Facebook” To begin with, I want you guys think of this question: what levels of privacy will we have in the future? Nowadays, many people have smartphones, and some of them use to identify their location. Such functions help us in many ways, such as finding the nearest restaurant. But it also higher the risk of privacy. Considering about the growth of technology, sooner or later, you might have smart watch…smart watch or smart car or smart blah blah blah, which will definitely make the privacy problem become more complicated. Also, Facebook will face the dilemma between advertiser and customer’s privacy. Facebook needs to please advertiser because 84% of revenue comes from them. The…Facebook also don’t want to lose us, who can embrace another social website just in a few clicks. As a result, the balance will be harder and harder to reach in the future.
So what should Facebook do? There’s a principle Facebook can keep in mind. That is “not everyone will want the same level of privacy” For example, some may not like to be tag in their photos, while for others, they will feel ok. Or they even welcome their friends to help them to promote themselves and share with their friends. At the same time, we all know personal data can have many potential positive uses. It can offer customized service to make our live more convenient. So if optional and easy-settings could offer, Facebook could be more acceptable to those who need privacy.
Another suggestion for Facebook is to offer the “Do not disturb system” this system has been used by many major browsers such as Google and Firefox. To this system, it allows the users to decide whether you accept website to provide online tracking. This system can effectively provide online security, but on the other hand, it would be a smash to the advertisements severely.

In conclusion, some day we might change our thoughts toward privacy and embrace personal services. But as long as there are still people, who feel uncomfortable to share themselves, Facebook should respect, and offer personal settings such as the “Do not disturb system”. The privacy problem for Facebook will only become more complicated in the future. And how to deal with this sensitive question wisely gives Facebook a severe test. Let’s welcome Kevin. 

Revise Annotation 4: The possible future and suggestions for privacy on Facebook

What kind of online privacy will we have in the future?
The possible future for privacy on Facebook can be concluded to one word: complicatednot only is it difficult in reaching balance, but also problematic in dealing with the varieties of technologies. As more and more people recognize the privacy problem, Facebook has already noticed and tried to find ways to content their customers. However, not only Facebook, but also Google and other social networks have faced the dilemma between advertisers and customer’s privacy. According to the statistics, Facebook makes more than 84% in revenue by online advertising (Kelly, 2013.) They are mostly lived by selling information to advertisers. But it doesn’t mean that the users can’t fight back. Facebook definitely don’t want to lose their users, and they also understand that users can stop using it and embrace new websites just in a few clicks. Besides, with the rapid growth of technology, privacy problems will only become more complex. From the small sensors that can track your location to smart cars which are not yet common place, the more we attach to the Internet, the more we expose ourselves to the public. “Privacy is increasingly becoming a feature,” said Brendon Lynch, Microsoft's chief privacy officer (Kelly, 2013.) In short, the balance between privacy and profits will only become more and more difficult to reach.
However, the author suggests a core idea that “not everyone will want the same levels of privacy”. Facebook can make user’s privacy optional with higher transparency. According to the author’s example, “personal data such as location have many potentially positive uses, such as food recommendations, social apps and dating services.” Balancing privacy and customized service may become possible when the settings are optional and easy-to-check. Another way Facebook can use is the “Do Not Disturb” system, which has been adopted by all major browsers such as Google and Firefox. This system allows users to choose whether they accept the websites to provide online tracking. Some describe this system as a nuclear bomb in advertising (Kelly, 2013.) while others consider it as a good way to protect their privacy. Moreover, privacy settings on Facebook should be more active to the customers. For example, when a new account is introduced into Facebook, the website should actively illustrate how Facebook works on their personal data. And Facebook can integrate private information only if the user agrees to receive personal services.
We might change our thoughts and tend to put more information on the Internet someday in exchange for customized servings. However, as long as people feel uncomfortable about sharing themselves, Facebook should respect and offer more options for them.

Source:
Kelly, H. (2013, March 1). Figuring out the future of online privacy. CNN, Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/tech/web/online-privacy-policies/. - See more at: http://reffor.us/index.php#sthash.bL3dxdkE.dpuf


Revise Annotation 3: Does Facebook try to protect user’s privacy? The inefficient settings and ethical problems

       With the waking conscious of individualism, people nowadays don’t just enjoy the convenience Facebook bring, but also gradually recognize their privacy. That is to say, we have the right to make life more convenient with Facebook, but we also have the conscious to look after our privacy. To support with this idea, let’s take a look at Facebook’s privacy policy, which is smart enough to follow the world trend. From time to time, Facebook has changed and enlarged its privacy policy up to 5000 words. But the problem is that no one will spend time carefully examining every step of their privacy settings. Some users complain: “the new policy is bewildering and the new opt-out settings is too time-consuming to figure out and use” (Bilton, 2010). Research also finds out that up to 36% of information share with default privacy settings, and only 37% matches to users expectation (Liu, Krishnamurthy, Gummadi & Mislove, 2010.) Although some are aware of their privacy, they are not allowed to have enough ways to manage or even protect.
To analyze why such a great company can’t figure out efficient ways to protect privacy, let’s look back to the source of iis profitable business river. It’s obvious that Facebook is not a charity, and they need to gain money from its users. So how do Facebook profit? According to the article (Johnson 2009), Facebook not only provides precise advertisements to users, but also creates virtual gifts or properties to catch people’s attention. Although Facebook claims that they only offer anonymous personal data to advertising company, no one can be certain what would be the next trade between Facebook and advertisements.
Also, as we put information on the Internet to share with friends, do we really want these trivial dates be collected? In the research paper of professor Qi, “we might offer personal information voluntarily to several separated data base. For example, we leave scores in schools and medical records in hospital. But it doesn’t mean that we allow others to collect them and further reveal our undiscovered side.” So is it right for Facebook to memorize our behaviors and collect every click we make? The answer is definitely wrong.
Just like what professor Qi mentions: “Privacy is not a new issue. However, due to the growth of information technology, it appears with different kinds of formation in all levels, which is more severe and urgent to focus on.” Facebook unpacks a gift for people: a new platform for social. But in another aspect it could be poison with a sugar coat, making most of the people vulnerable when they choose to embrace the world naively.

Resources:

1.     Bilton, N. (2010, May 12). Price of Facebook Privacy? Start Clicking. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/technology/personaltech/13bas ics.html?_r=0
2.     Johnson, B. (2009). How exactly is Facebook making money?. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2009/sep/16/facebook-money
3.     Liu, Y., Gummadi, K. P., Krishnamurthy, B., & Mislove, A. (2009). Analyzing Facebook Privacy Setting: User Expectation V.S. Reality. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2068823
4.     Qi, G. (2011). The ethic issue in information age. Retrieved November 29,2013, from http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~phi/NRAE/newsletter/no5/04.html

2013年12月17日 星期二

Annotation 4:The possible future and suggestion for privacy on Facebook

       What kind of online privacy will we have in the future?
As more and more people recognize the privacy problem, Facebook has already noticed and tried to find ways to content their customers. However, not only Facebook, but also Google and other social networks have faced the dilemma between advertisers and customer’s privacy. According to the statistics, Facebook made more than 84% in revenue by online advertising (Kelly, 2013.) They are mostly lived by selling information and advertisements. But it doesn’t mean that the users can’t fight back. Facebook definitely don’t want to lose their users, and they also understand that users can stop using it and embrace new websites just in a few clicks. Also, with the rapid growth of technology, privacy problems will only become more complex. From the small sensors that can track your location to smart cars which are not yet common place, the more we attach to the Internet, the more we expose ourselves to the public. “Privacy is increasingly becoming a feature,” said Brendon Lynch, Microsoft's chief privacy officer (Kelly, 2013.) In short, the balance between privacy and profits will only become more and more difficult to reach.
However, the author suggests an idea that “not everyone will want the same levels of privacy”. Facebook can make user’s privacy optional with higher transparency. According to the author’s example, “personal data such as location have many potentially positive uses, such as food recommendations, social apps and dating services.” Balancing privacy and customized service may become possible when the settings are optional and easy-to-check. 
Another way Facebook can use is the “Do Not Disturb” system, which has been adopted by all major browsers such as Google and Firefox. This system allows users to choose whether they accept the websites provide online tracking. Some describe this system as a nuclear bomb in advertising, (Kelly, 2013) while others consider it as a good way to protect their privacy.
We might change our thoughts and tend to put more information on the Internet someday in exchange for customized servings. However, as long as people feel uncomfortable about sharing themselves, Facebook should respect and offer more options for them. Moreover, privacy settings should be more active to the customers. For example, when a new account is introduced into Facebook, the website should actively illustrate how Facebook works on their personal data. And Facebook can integrate private information only if the user agrees to receive personal services.

Source:
Kelly, H. (2013, March 1). Figuring out the future of online privacy. CNN, Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/tech/web/online-privacy-policies/. - See more at: http://reffor.us/index.php#sthash.bL3dxdkE.dpuf